Constitutional Law And Constitutional Lawyers in Chandigarh
Self help guide to understand and navigate through the process
Home »
-
At B&B Associates LLP, our constitutional law practice is defined by strategic litigation, in-depth research, and effective representation before the Punjab & Haryana High Court and the Supreme Court of India. We advise clients in matters involving fundamental rights, judicial review, and constitutional interpretation, where precision and experience make all the difference.
Our Chandigarh based team brings together senior advocates, legal strategists, and procedural experts who operate at the intersection of law and civil liberty. We are frequently retained in matters where the Constitution itself is at stake whether through challenges to executive action, enforcement of fundamental rights, or interpretation of legislative authority.
Constitutional Law: The Backbone of Indian Democracy
The Constitution of India, adopted in 1950, is not simply a governing document—it is the legal foundation for the rights of every individual and the structure of every public institution. Constitutional law defines the balance of power, sets the limits of state authority, and guarantees civil liberties.
In practice, constitutional disputes often involve:
- Denial or infringement of fundamental rights
- Ultra vires legislation or government action
- Unlawful detention or misuse of authority
- Censorship, discrimination, or suppression of lawful dissent
In Chandigarh, seat of both Punjab and Haryana governments and host to their shared High Court. Such issues routinely arise at both individual and institutional levels.
Our Practice Areas in Constitutional Law
We offer high-level counsel and representation in:
1. Writ Jurisdiction (Articles 32 & 226)
Under Articles 32 and 226 of the Constitution of India, citizens have the right to seek relief from the courts in cases involving violations of fundamental rights or legal duties. The following writs serve as tools for ensuring constitutional compliance and administrative accountability:
Habeas Corpus
Used to secure the release of an individual from unlawful detention.
Use Case: A person detained without being presented before a magistrate within 24 hours may invoke this writ to challenge the legality of the detention.
Mandamus
Issued to compel a public authority or official to perform a legal duty they are bound to fulfill.
Use Case: Where a public body fails to act on a statutory application (e.g., issuance of a license or document), Mandamus may be sought.
Prohibition
Restrains a lower court or tribunal from exceeding its jurisdiction or acting contrary to legal procedure.
Use Case: If a tribunal initiates proceedings beyond its statutory competence, this writ halts the process.
Certiorari
Used to quash the decision of a lower court or tribunal that acted outside its jurisdiction or in violation of natural justice.
Use Case: When an administrative tribunal issues an order without providing a fair hearing, Certiorari may be invoked.
Quo Warranto
Questions the legality of a person holding a public office and challenges the authority under which they claim the position.
Use Case: If a person assumes public office without meeting constitutional or statutory qualifications, this writ allows for judicial review of the appointment.
2. Judicial Review
We challenge unconstitutional statutes, executive orders, and regulations. Our approach ensures legal compliance, policy integrity, and protection of individual rights.
3. Public Interest Litigation (PIL)
We represent in matters of public concern where access to justice is essential but traditionally unavailable. Our PIL work has addressed administrative failures, human rights violations, and systemic injustice.
4. Special Leave Petitions (SLP) – Supreme Court
Under Article 136, we prepare and argue SLPs on constitutional questions of national importance, ensuring that gross injustice or significant errors of law do not go unchallenged.
5. Rights Enforcement
We litigate violations of:
- Article 14: Equality before law
- Article 19: Freedoms of speech, movement, association
- Article 21:Right to life and personal liberty
- Articles 25–30: Religious, cultural, and educational freedoms
- Article 32: Constitutional remedies
We also advise institutions, associations, and professionals on the scope and limits of their powers under the Constitution.
Constitutional Framework We Operate Within
Our litigation is grounded in the structure and principles of:
- The Constitution of India, 1950
- Fundamental Rights (Part III)
- Directive Principles of State Policy (Part IV)
- Fundamental Duties (Part IVA)
- Judicial precedent from High Courts and the Supreme Court
We remain updated with evolving jurisprudence and statutory changes affecting constitutional interpretation.
Why Choose Our Constitutional Lawyers in Chandigarh?
- Proven litigaton experience in writs, PILs, and SLPs
- In-depth familiarity with the High Court’s procedural and jurisprudential stance
- Well-reasoned drafting, supported by legal research
- Discretion and professionalism in handling sensitive or high-profile matters
- Compliance with ethical norms, avoiding frivolous claims or guarantees
We work only with clients who understand the seriousness of constitutional litigation and the level of preparation and patience it demands.
Client Considerations Before Filing Constitutional Petitions
Before proceeding with a constitutional remedy, clients must consider:
- Jurisdiction: whether the matter lies within High Court or Supreme Court purview
- Maintainability: whether the case involves direct violation of rights
- Relief sought: including interim relief, directions, or judicial declaration
- Time sensitivity: limitation periods and urgency of harm
- Alternative remedies: whether statutory options have been exhausted
We offer strategic consultation to determine if constitutional action is warranted—and prepare the matter accordingly.
REQUEST CONSULTATION:
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Meeting with potential lawyers to discuss the matter and understand their approach and bent of mind can bring clarity in making a well-informed decision.
It is advisable to know the consultation charges beforehand.
Generally, good lawyers are professionals who do not render free legal advice.
Consult 2-3 lawyers before dotting on your best find.
If travelling comes as a task, you may consult via phone, or email, or teleconferencing.
Many reputed law offices are equipped with remote consulting.FAQs ON CONSTITUTIONAL LAW
What is Constitutional Law?
Constitutional law is the body of law that defines the relationship between different entities within a state, namely the executive, the legislature, and the judiciary. It outlines the rights of individuals and the powers of the government as enshrined in the Constitution of India.
Who are Constitutional Lawyers?
Constitutional Lawyers are legal professionals who specialize in cases involving the interpretation and application of the Constitution of India. They handle issues such as the violation of fundamental rights, public interest litigation, and disputes involving the powers and duties of government authorities.
What are the common issues handled by Constitutional Lawyers?
Common issues include:
- Violation of fundamental rights.
- Unlawful detention.
- Discrimination based on religion, caste, sex, or place of birth.
- Public interest litigation to address societal issues.
- Challenges to government actions and policies.
- Protection of minority rights.
How can I seek justice through Public Interest Litigation (PIL)?
Public Interest Litigation (PIL) allows individuals or groups to file petitions in the High Court or Supreme Court on matters of public interest. It is an effective tool for addressing issues that affect large sections of society, such as environmental concerns, human rights violations, and corruption.
What is the procedure for filing a writ petition?
The procedure involves:
- Identifying the Violation: Determine the specific fundamental right that has been violated.
- Drafting the Petition: Prepare a detailed petition outlining the facts, evidence, and legal grounds for the writ.
- Filing the Petition: Submit the petition to the appropriate High Court or the Supreme Court.
- Court Hearing: The court will review the petition, hear arguments, and decide on the issuance of the writ.
What are the types of writs available under Indian law?
There are five types of writs:
- Habeas Corpus: To release a person unlawfully detained.
- Mandamus: To compel a public official to perform a duty.
- Prohibition: To stop a lower court from exceeding its jurisdiction.
- Certiorari: To quash an order passed by a lower court.
- Quo Warranto: To challenge the legality of a person’s claim to a public office.
How do I know if my fundamental rights have been violated?
Signs of fundamental rights violations include:
- Arbitrary arrest or detention.
- Discrimination based on race, religion, caste, or gender.
- Suppression of free speech or assembly.
- Unlawful restrictions on movement or profession.
What responsibilities do clients have when working with Constitutional Lawyers?
Clients should:
- Provide accurate and complete information.
- Be honest about all aspects of their case.
- Follow legal advice and instructions.
- Cooperate with legal proceedings and attend court hearings as required.
Where can I find a reputable Constitutional lawyer in Chandigarh?
When looking for someone reputable for your Constitutional matter in Chandigarh, it might be helpful to seek recommendations from people you know and trust, and who have been through a similar journey through a good professional. Additionally, exploring available resources and gathering insights from others’ experiences can provide useful guidance.
-
-
Joseph Shine Vs Union of India
Supreme Court of India Year : 2018
Smt. Sowmithri Vishnu Vs Union of India & Anr
Supreme Court of India Year : 1985
Sri Sankari Prasad Singh Deo Vs. Union of India and State of Bihar(and Other Cases).
Supreme Court of India Year : 1951
I.R. Coelho (Dead)by Lrs. Vs The State of Tamil Nadu
Supreme Court of India Year : 2007
Ghan Shyam Das Gupta and Anr. Vs. Anant Kumar Sinha and Ors.
Supreme Court of India Year : 1991
Kihoto Hollohan Vs. Zachillhu and Others
Supreme Court of India Year : 1992
M/s Atv Projects (India) Ltd Vs. Union of India & Ors.
Delhi High Court Year : 2017
Dr. N.B. Khare Vs. The State of Delhi
Supreme Court of India Year : 1950
Mian Abdul Qayoom Vs State of J&K and others
Jammu and Kashmir High Court Year : 2020
Daryao and Others vs The State of U.P. and Others
Supreme Court of India Year : 1961
Amalgamated Coalfields Ltd. & Anr vs Janapada Sabha Chhindwara
Supreme Court of India Year : 1961
Ms. Sujata Kapoor Vs Union Bank of India and Ors
Delhi High Court Year : 2019
Allahabad High Court Year : 2019
Munish Kakkar Vs. Nidhi Kakkar
Supreme Court of India Year : 2019
Ghanshyam Dass Gupta Vs Makhan Lal
Supreme Court of India Year : 2012
Abdur Rahman & Ors vs Athifa Begum & Ors
Supreme Court of India Year : 1996
Sri Prabodh Ch. Das and Anr. Vs Mahamaya Das and Ors.
Supreme Court of India Year : 2019
Contempt notices to striking lawyers in J&K
Jammu and Kashmir High Court Year : 2019
M/s Plr Projects Pvt. Ltd. Vs Mahanadi Coalfields Limited & Ors.
Supreme Court of India Year : 2019
Dr. Subhash Kashinath Mahajan Vs The State of Maharashtra and Anr.
Supreme Court of India Year : 2018
Punjab & Haryana High Court Year : 2009
Selvi & Ors vs State Of Karnataka & Anr
Supreme Court of India Year : 2010
Ritesh Sinha Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh & ANR.
Supreme Court of India Year : 2012
Jagmohan Singh vs The State Of U. P
Supreme Court of India Year : 1972
T.V. Vatheeswaran vs State Of Tamil Nadu
Supreme Court of India Year : 1983
Sushila Saw Mill vs. the State of Orissa
Supreme Court of India Year : 1995
Ashoka Kumar Thakur vs. Union of India
Supreme Court of India Year : 2008
M. R. Balaji and Others vs State of Mysore
Supreme Court of India Year : 1963
Miss Mohini Jain vs State of Karnataka And Ors
Supreme Court of India Year : 1992
State of Haryana and Ors. Etc. Vs. Piara Singh and Ors. Etc.
Supreme Court of India Year : 1992
Fertilizer Corporation Kamgar Union (Regd.), Sindri Another Vs. Union of India And Others
Supreme Court of India Year : 1980
Pt. Parmanand Katara vs Union Of India & Ors
Supreme Court of India Year : 1989
Javed & Ors vs State of Haryana & Ors
Supreme Court of India Year : 2003
Deepika and Another vs State of U.P. and 3 Others
Allahabad High Court Year : 2013
Shakti Vahini vs Union of India
Supreme Court of India Year : 2018
S.P. Gupta vs. Union of India (Part-III)
Supreme Court of India Year : 1981
S.P. Gupta vs Union of India (Part-II)
Supreme Court of India Year : 1981
Indra Sawhney vs. Union of India
Supreme Court of India Year : 1999
S.R. Bommai vs. Union of India
Supreme Court of India Year : 1994
Kesavananda Bharati vs. State of Kerala (Part IV)
Supreme Court of India Year : 1973
Kesavananda Bharati vs. State of Kerala (Part III)
Supreme Court of India Year : 1973
Kesavananda Bharati vs. State of Kerala (Part II)
Supreme Court of India Year : 1973
Kesavananda Bharati vs State of Kerala (Part I)
Supreme Court of India Year : 1973
Supreme Court Advocates on Record vs. Union of India (Part-V)
Supreme Court of India Year : 2015
Supreme Court Advocates on Record vs. Union of India (Part-IV)
Supreme Court of India Year : 2015
Supreme Court Advocates on Record vs Union of India (Part-III)
Supreme Court of India Year : 2015
Supreme Court Advocates on Record vs. Union of India (Part-II)
Supreme Court of India Year : 2015
Supreme Court Advocates on Record vs Union of India (Part-I)
Supreme Court of India Year : 2015
-
-