Home »
Lawyers with over 40 years of standing and thousands of rightly resolved matters. START CONSULTING:
(Know about the law firm’s constitution law practice, fields of interest, region, steps of retention and applicable procedure.)
Prior to finding and hiring the best constitutional and writ petition lawyers in Chandigarh, make sure you know the process and for what you need legal help. You need to be clear about what constitutional and writ lawyers do, how can a constitutional lawyer help you, and for what kind of matters you can approach a constitutional and writ lawyer.
The Constitution of India is the supreme law of India, an instrument from which every government system derives its existence be it legislature, executive or judiciary. The constitution of India is the lengthiest written constitution of any sovereign nation. It was codified on 26 November 1949, and made law of land on 26 January 1950. It lays down the framework defining the basic structure and establishes procedures, powers and duties of every governmental institution and organization.
Constitution has incorporated fundamental rights bestowed upon the people and which in way work as restrictions/ prohibitions against the State, followed by the fundamental duties being the moral obligations upon the citizens to ensure that the spirit of the constitution is preserved, further embedded are the directive principles being the goals and objectives for every government to ensure a good governance. This voluminous document consists of 448 articles spread in 25 parts, 12 schedules. There have been 104 amendments in the constitution till 25 January 2020.
Read Also: 22 Unknown Facts About The Constitution Of India
B&B Associates LLP is known for its impeccable legal services and seasoned lawyers. For over 38 years, our legal fraternity has been representing clients in District Courts, High Courts and Supreme Court. Years of hard work and dedication helps B&B Associates LLP stay a trusted law firm in Chandigarh for constitutional and writ matters.
Therefore, entrusted by plenty of national and international clientele to safeguard and resolve their matters efficiently under the scope and ambit of civil and criminal writ jurisdiction ranging from illegal termination, illegal detention, challenging one’s citizenship, illegal attachment of allowances, protection of life and liberty, etc.
Writ jurisdiction of the Hon’ble High Court in the nature of habeas corpus, mandamus, prohibition, quo warranto, and certiorari can be invoked in cases like-
a. Illegal detention
b. Illegal termination
c. Illegal attachment of the allowances
d. Protection of life and liberty
e. Challenging the constitutionality of law
f. Interpretation of law
g. Safeguarding the fundamental rights
h. Un-just Restrictions and punishments
i. Challenging and safeguarding citizenship
One must not wait for things to mend on their own as this might lead to bigger complications and problems. Be it a matter of un-just restrictions and punishments or matter pertains to the protection of life and liberty or illegal termination or illegal detention, etc. in such circumstances it becomes all the more imperative to take the right legal advice and adopt an effective recourse.
1. Reserve appointment:
2. Consult:
3. Retain:
The firm prefers a proactive approach for its clients and extends responsible dealings to them. The team works closely with clients with an unbiased, unprejudiced & dedicated support system. With an experience of over 38 years and unparalleled expertise in the field, Mrs. Bhandari heads our team.
While all above named counsels are well-versed in civil law and procedure, the above names are arranged in seniority of their position in the firm.
Golden Rules
**We deject un-ethical and immoral practices, and reserve our rights of extending legal services only to a select clientele which exhibits civility, faith in law, sound moral footing, and good conscience. Our legal counsels defend the ones who have falsely been implicated, and prosecute for those who have actually been victimized – in either case, our counsels reserve their right of exercising discretion in accepting or rejecting a brief/ lawsuit
The preamble is preliminary and the introductory part of the constitution that explains and sets out the spirit, philosophy and values of the nation and lays down the structure of the nation.
Secularism means that religion and politics should be separated and at the same time should not influence each other. A secular state means that a state does not have an official or preferred religion.
Republic means that a state which is not led by a hereditary monarch rather the head of the state is elected by the people.
Supreme Court and High Courts
A writ is a directive issued by the Hon’ble Supreme Court and High Courts to carry out their directives for the enforcement of various fundamental rights and/or legal rights of the affected person.
In order to obtain a writ, the petitioner must establish that he has a legal right to the performance by the opposite party of a legal duty imposed by a statute while the opposite party has failed to perform such duty.
Writ of Habeas Corpus is a writ requiring a person under arrest to be brought before a judge or into court, especially to secure the person’s release unless lawful grounds are shown for their detention.
Writ of Habeas Corpus
Mandamus is a command issued to direct any person, corporation, inferior court or Government, requiring him or them to do some particular thing therein specified which pertains to his or their office and is in the nature of a public duty.
Certiorari is issued for correcting the errors of jurisdiction, as when an inferior court or Tribunal acts without jurisdiction or in excess of it, or fails to exercise its jurisdiction. Certiorari is issued when the Court or Tribunal acts illegally in the exercise of its undoubted jurisdiction.
Writ of Quo warranto is issued to oust a person from usurping a public office. In other words the procedure of quo warranto confers jurisdiction and authority on the judiciary to control executive action in the matter of making appointments to public offices against the relevant statutory provisions; it also protects a citizen from being deprived of public office to which he may have a right.
A writ of Prohibition is issued to an inferior Tribunal prohibiting it from continuing with a proceeding on the ground that it is without or in excess of the jurisdiction or contrary of the laws of the land, statutory or otherwise.
Parliament has passed the Constitution 124th (Amendment) Bill, 2019. The legislation provides for ten per cent reservation in government jobs and admission in educational institutions to economically backward people among upper castes.
Joseph Shine Vs Union of India
Supreme Court of India Year : 2018
Smt. Sowmithri Vishnu Vs Union of India & Anr
Supreme Court of India Year : 1985
Sri Sankari Prasad Singh Deo Vs. Union of India and State of Bihar(and Other Cases).
Supreme Court of India Year : 1951
I.R. Coelho (Dead)by Lrs. Vs The State of Tamil Nadu
Supreme Court of India Year : 2007
Ghan Shyam Das Gupta and Anr. Vs. Anant Kumar Sinha and Ors.
Supreme Court of India Year : 1991
Kihoto Hollohan Vs. Zachillhu and Others
Supreme Court of India Year : 1992
M/s Atv Projects (India) Ltd Vs. Union of India & Ors.
Delhi High Court Year : 2017
Dr. N.B. Khare Vs. The State of Delhi
Supreme Court of India Year : 1950
Mian Abdul Qayoom Vs State of J&K and others
Jammu and Kashmir High Court Year : 2020
Daryao and Others vs The State of U.P. and Others
Supreme Court of India Year : 1961
Amalgamated Coalfields Ltd. & Anr vs Janapada Sabha Chhindwara
Supreme Court of India Year : 1961
Ms. Sujata Kapoor Vs Union Bank of India and Ors
Delhi High Court Year : 2019
Allahabad High Court Year : 2019
Munish Kakkar Vs. Nidhi Kakkar
Supreme Court of India Year : 2019
Ghanshyam Dass Gupta Vs Makhan Lal
Supreme Court of India Year : 2012
Abdur Rahman & Ors vs Athifa Begum & Ors
Supreme Court of India Year : 1996
Sri Prabodh Ch. Das and Anr. Vs Mahamaya Das and Ors.
Supreme Court of India Year : 2019
Contempt notices to striking lawyers in J&K
Jammu and Kashmir High Court Year : 2019
M/s Plr Projects Pvt. Ltd. Vs Mahanadi Coalfields Limited & Ors.
Supreme Court of India Year : 2019
Dr. Subhash Kashinath Mahajan Vs The State of Maharashtra and Anr.
Supreme Court of India Year : 2018
Punjab & Haryana High Court Year : 2009
Selvi & Ors vs State Of Karnataka & Anr
Supreme Court of India Year : 2010
Ritesh Sinha Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh & ANR.
Supreme Court of India Year : 2012
Jagmohan Singh vs The State Of U. P
Supreme Court of India Year : 1972
T.V. Vatheeswaran vs State Of Tamil Nadu
Supreme Court of India Year : 1983
Sushila Saw Mill vs. the State of Orissa
Supreme Court of India Year : 1995
Ashoka Kumar Thakur vs. Union of India
Supreme Court of India Year : 2008
M. R. Balaji and Others vs State of Mysore
Supreme Court of India Year : 1963
Miss Mohini Jain vs State of Karnataka And Ors
Supreme Court of India Year : 1992
State of Haryana and Ors. Etc. Vs. Piara Singh and Ors. Etc.
Supreme Court of India Year : 1992
Fertilizer Corporation Kamgar Union (Regd.), Sindri Another Vs. Union of India And Others
Supreme Court of India Year : 1980
Pt. Parmanand Katara vs Union Of India & Ors
Supreme Court of India Year : 1989
Javed & Ors vs State of Haryana & Ors
Supreme Court of India Year : 2003
Deepika and Another vs State of U.P. and 3 Others
Allahabad High Court Year : 2013
Shakti Vahini vs Union of India
Supreme Court of India Year : 2018
S.P. Gupta vs. Union of India (Part-III)
Supreme Court of India Year : 1981
S.P. Gupta vs Union of India (Part-II)
Supreme Court of India Year : 1981
Indra Sawhney vs. Union of India
Supreme Court of India Year : 1999
S.R. Bommai vs. Union of India
Supreme Court of India Year : 1994
Kesavananda Bharati vs. State of Kerala (Part IV)
Supreme Court of India Year : 1973
Kesavananda Bharati vs. State of Kerala (Part III)
Supreme Court of India Year : 1973
Kesavananda Bharati vs. State of Kerala (Part II)
Supreme Court of India Year : 1973
Kesavananda Bharati vs State of Kerala (Part I)
Supreme Court of India Year : 1973
Supreme Court Advocates on Record vs. Union of India (Part-V)
Supreme Court of India Year : 2015
Supreme Court Advocates on Record vs. Union of India (Part-IV)
Supreme Court of India Year : 2015
Supreme Court Advocates on Record vs Union of India (Part-III)
Supreme Court of India Year : 2015
Supreme Court Advocates on Record vs. Union of India (Part-II)
Supreme Court of India Year : 2015
Supreme Court Advocates on Record vs Union of India (Part-I)
Supreme Court of India Year : 2015