News

Home » News » Madras HC dismissed Puducherry CM’s plea challenging the cash transfer to ration cardholders


The Madras High Court on 21 February, has dismissed a writ petition filed by the Puducherry Chief Minister V Narayanasamy, who challenged a decision taken by the President concurring with Lieutenant Governor Kiran Bedi, to disburse cash instead of free rice to ration cardholders.

The bench headed by Justice C V Karthikeyan while hearing the plea filed by Chief Minister V Narayanasamy held that he could not question the President’s order, communicated through the Union Ministry of Home Affairs, since being a CM, he has to adhere to the oath taken to bear true faith and allegiance to the Constitution and act in accordance with the Constitution and the law. Further, while citing to the Government of Union Territories Act 1963, which empowers the Lieutenant Governor to refer an issue to the President if he/she disagrees with the advice provided by the Council of Ministers, the judge stated that the Act specifically states that a decision taken by the President, on such a reference, must be acted upon without posing any question or expecting an answer.

“When a decision has been rendered by the President, then further actions must only be according to the decision given by the President. This is binding on the Council of Ministers, which includes the Chief Minister, and also the Lieutenant Governor,” stated Justice C V Karthikeyan.

The Puducherry Chief Minister V Narayanasamy through a writ petition has challenged a decision taken by the President concurring with Lieutenant Governor Kiran Bedi, in favour of disbursing cash to ration cardholders instead of supplying them free rice, as resolved by the Council of Ministers of the Union Territory.

According to the petitioner, in furtherance of its poll promises during the 2016 Assembly elections, the government had passed a resolution on 7 June 2019, to continue the welfare scheme of providing the items in kind and referred the same to Union Home Ministry on 5 September. However, the ministry differed and advised the government to continue the scheme with Direct Benefit Transfer (i.e. directing subsidies to people through their bank accounts) in lieu of distribution of free rice and the same was passed in an interim order, delivered by Kiran Bedi.

Dismissing the writ petition, the court stated that “This court, even while exercising its writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the constitution can never examine the merits/demerits of two different proposals. Therefore, very consciously, I am not entering into any discussion as to whether the supply of free rice is a better option or not.”


Comments and feedback are always welcomed!

Related News


Indefinite Suspension of Internet Not Permissible – SC in Kashmir Lockdown

Indefinite Suspension of Internet Not Permissible – SC in Kashmir Lockdown

On 10 January, the Supreme Court stated that the internet ban in Jammu and Kashmir is a violation of both the telecom rules and the freedom of speech and expression granted by the Constitution of India. The court further directed the Jammu and Kashmir administration to review all the restrictive orders imposed on the state, […]

SC directs Centre to take criminal action against fake news; also to ensure welfare of migrant worker

SC directs Centre to take criminal action against fake news; also to ensure welfare of migrant worke ...

Responding to the Supreme Court’s direction to submit a status report on steps taken regarding the plight of migrant workers, the Centre on Tuesday submitted a detailed status report citing that all migrants have been shifted to the nearest available shelters as they pose a risk of spreading the coronavirus if they return home. The […]

SC To Hear Plea Challenging the Detention of Omar Abdullah, On 5 March

SC To Hear Plea Challenging the Detention of Omar Abdullah, On 5 March

The Supreme Court has today agreed to hear the petition filed by the ex-Chief Minister of Jammu and Kashmir, Omar Abdullah’s sister, Sarah Abdullah Pilot, challenging her brother’s detention under the Public Safety Act, 1978. The bench comprising of Justices Arun Mishra and Indira Banerjee has considered hearing the petition on Thursday, after Solicitor General […]

NHRC issued notice to UP DGP for violation of human rights during anti-CAA protests

NHRC issued notice to UP DGP for violation of human rights during anti-CAA protests

The National Human Rights Commission has issued a notice to the director-general of UP police, following various complaints of their alleged ‘violation of human rights’ during the ongoing anti-CAA protests in UP. NHRC observed that in the last few days, various incidents of deaths have been reported across Uttar Pradesh, mostly of youngsters, primarily from […]