News

Home » News » After the deadly Pune Accident Teen Back in Custody


The recent Porsche accident in Pune accident that claimed the lives of two young IT professionals, Aneesh Awadhiya and Ashwini Koshta, has sparked outrage and renewed scrutiny of loopholes in the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 (JJ Act).

Initial Bail Granted, Public outcry Erupts

A 17-year-old boy, allegedly driving the Porsche at a high speed while intoxicated, was initially granted bail by the Juvenile Justice Board (JJ Board) on a surety of Rs. 7,500. This decision caused a public outcry, with many questioning the leniency shown towards the minor accused, especially considering the severity of the charges.

JJ Act and Bail Provisions

The JJ Act prioritizes rehabilitation for juveniles in conflict with the law. Bail applications under the Act are decided differently from regular courts. Here’s where potential loopholes come into play:

  • Presumption of Bail: The JJ Act emphasizes that a juvenile should be released on bail unless there are strong reasons to believe they might abscond or interfere with the investigation.
  • Focus on Rehabilitation: The emphasis is on reforming the juvenile, and detention is seen as a last resort.

Loopholes and Calls for Reform

Critics argue that these provisions can be misused in serious cases. The following are some potential loopholes highlighted in the Pune incident:

  • Vague Criteria for Bail Denial: The Act doesn’t clearly define what constitutes “strong reasons” to deny bail, potentially leading to inconsistent application.
  • Severity of Crime Not Given Due Weight: The JJ Act’s focus on rehabilitation might not adequately consider the gravity of the offense, particularly in cases with fatalities.

Bail Cancelled, Investigation Continues

Following public pressure and concerns about witness tampering, the JJ Board revoked the minor’s bail and remanded him to an observation home until June 5th. The investigation into the pune accident is ongoing, with police looking into the involvement of pubs that allegedly served alcohol to the minor and the boy’s claim that his driver was behind the wheel.

This tragic incident has reignited discussions about potential reforms to the JJ Act to ensure a more balanced approach that prioritizes both rehabilitation and accountability for serious crimes involving juveniles.


We welcome your comments & feedback

Related News



error: Content is protected !!