News

Home » News » UP Bans Late Evening Coaching Classes For Girls To Ensure Women’s Safety


The directive issued by the Uttar Pradesh government, prohibiting private coaching institutes from conducting late-evening classes for female students, has stirred a heated debate at the intersection of women’s safety and education. Part of the Safe City project, an initiative aimed at ensuring the safety of women, children, and senior citizens, the directive has become a focal point for discussions on social media.

Critics argue that the directive poses a threat to the dreams and aspirations of female students, contending that it contradicts electoral promises made by the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) to enhance the safety of women in Uttar Pradesh. From this perspective, the restriction is seen as a setback, limiting women’s access to educational opportunities and impeding their progress.

On the contrary, some social media users endorse the directive, asserting that it is a necessary measure for the protection of women. They argue that, until overall safety in the city improves, guidelines prioritizing women’s security are essential. Some proponents even suggest that online classes can serve as a viable alternative during this period.

The directive has also prompted discussions about the disparate treatment of male and female students. Observers have pointed out the absence of similar restrictions on male students, prompting questions about inherent gender bias and the need for equitable opportunities in education.

Opinions on the directive diverge, but it has undeniably initiated a meaningful conversation on crucial issues such as women’s safety, access to education, and the government’s role in fostering an inclusive learning environment for all students.

  • Directive Details: The directive instructs private coaching institutes not to conduct late-evening classes for female students as part of the Safe City project, an initiative focused on ensuring the safety of women, children, and senior citizens.
  • Critics’ Perspective: Critics argue that the directive is discriminatory and poses a threat to the aspirations of female students. They claim that it contradicts electoral promises and restricts women’s access to education.
  • Supporters’ Perspective: Supporters believe the directive is a necessary step for prioritizing women’s safety. They argue that, until overall safety improves, guidelines like these are needed to protect women, suggesting online classes as a temporary alternative.
  • Debate on Gender Treatment: The directive, applicable only to female students, has sparked concerns about gender bias. Some argue that similar restrictions should be imposed on male students, emphasizing the importance of equal opportunities for all in education.

We welcome your comments & feedback

Related News