News

Home » News » What is wrong with protesting? – SC while hearing the bail plea of Chandrashekhar


On 14 January, the Delhi’s Tis Hazari court, Additional Sessions Judge Kamini Lau while hearing the bail plea of the Bhim Army Chief – Chandrashekhar Azad, stated that ‘it is the constitutional right to protest.’ She further questioned the police investigation into the case that led to Azad’s arrest.

“What is wrong with dharna? What is wrong with protesting? It is one’s constitutional right to protest,” Lau insisted Pankaj Bhatia, the Additional Public Prosecutor representing the Delhi Police. She further stated that the prosecutor is behaving as if Jama Masjid is Pakistan. “Even if it was in Pakistan, you can go there and protest. Pakistan was a part of undivided India,” she asserted.

Judge Lau further took a serious note stating that the Supreme Court has repeatedly said that the use of Section 144  of the Criminal Procedure Code is an “abuse,” when the prosecutor argued that prior permission for the protest was needed. She further questioned the ‘objectionable statements’ based on which the Delhi Police made the arrests.

‘Where is the illegality? Tell me about the law. What has investigation shown?’ the judge asked.

As per reports, Azad’s outfit had called for a protest march from Jama Masjid to Jantar Mantar against the amended Citizenship Act on 20 December, without police permission. Chandrashekar along with the other 15 people was arrested by police from Jama Masjid. However, the other 15 people arrested in the case were granted bail by the court on 9 January. Azad was booked under Sections 147 (punishment for rioting), 148 (rioting, armed with a deadly weapon), 149 (unlawful assembly), 186 (obstructing public servant in discharge of public), 120B (criminal conspiracy) and other relevant sections of the Indian Penal Code. Subsequently, on 21 December, a Delhi Court dismissed his bail plea and sent him to judicial custody till January 18.

The present bail plea, filed through advocates, OP Bharti and Jatin Bhatt, claimed that charging Azad with being a part of an unlawful assembly was ‘erroneous,’ as at no point in time during the alleged incident did the police authorities declare the peaceful protestors to be an unlawful assembly. The bail plea further claimed that Azad was falsely implicated as the allegations leveled against him in the FIR were not only ‘ill-founded,’ but also ‘improbable.’

During the hearing on Tuesday, the Additional Public Prosecutor referred to “thousands of social media posts” of the accused and argued that there was an attempt on part of Azad to incite violence. Subsequently, the judge asked the prosecutor to read out some of Azad’s posts which cited people to gather at Jama Masjid.

Judge Lau asked the prosecutor, ‘I want you to show me under which law is it prohibited for someone to prohibit outside religious places?’ She also raised questions on the investigation that is being followed during the arrest.

‘Do you think our Delhi Police is so backward that they have no recorded evidence? In small matters Delhi Police have recorded evidence why not in this incident,’ Lau further noted.

Related News


Bombay HC Allows 66-Year-Old to Adopt a 22-Year-Old Woman

Bombay HC Allows 66-Year-Old to Adopt a 22-Year-Old Woman

The Bombay high court (HC) approved an adoption petition filed by a 66-year-old man, Mathew Inacio Abreo, who wanted to legally adopt a 22-year-old woman, Malaica Abreo, who was previously raised by Mathew and his wife. Rakesh Kapoor, the advocate appearing for the petitioner informed the court that the HC through an order dated 11 […]

Manipur to be Included in the ILP Regime – Amit Shah

Manipur to be Included in the ILP Regime – Amit Shah

During the Lok Sabha interaction session of the Citizenship Amendment Bill on 9 December, the Union Home Minister, Amit Shah assured to extend Manipur into the limit of Inner Line Permit (ILP). Shah thanked Prime Minister Narendra Modi for agreeing to include Manipur as well, under the ILP regime. Previously, Arunachal Pradesh, Mizoram, and Nagaland […]

J&K High Court withdraws its notification which opened District Court Vacancies on Pan-India Basis

J&K High Court withdraws its notification which opened District Court Vacancies on Pan-India Basis

On 26 December 2019, the High court of Jammu and Kashmir invited applications from all over the country to fill 33 vacancies in district courts of the Union territories – J&K and Ladakh. The posts mentioned in the notification includes senior scale stenographer, junior scale stenographer, steno typist, compositor, electrician, and driver. However, the said […]

Mobile internet and broadband services restored in parts of Jammu and Kashmir

Mobile internet and broadband services restored in parts of Jammu and Kashmir

On 14 January, the Jammu and Kashmir government declared the restoration of 2G mobile connectivity in five districts of the Jammu region. Further, broadband facilities will be restored to ‘all the institutions dealing with essential services’ as well as hospitals, banks, and hotels among others. As per sources, the said order will be effective from […]


Head Office
#588, Sector 6
Panchkula, Haryana, 134109

Chandigarh
#624 Sector 16-D
Chandigarh, 160015

Panchkula
#52, Swastik Vihar-II MDC
Sector 5, Panchkula, 134114

Faridabad
360, Sector 19 ,
Faridabad Haryana 121007

Noida
501, KT – 4, Jaypee’s Wish Town,
Sector 128, Noida, NCR 201304

Dehradun
A-1-4 Pinnacle Residency,
Rajpur Road, Dehradun

Lucknow
565KA/94, Amrudhi Bagh, Singar Nagar,
Alambagh, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh 226005

Ludhiana
#33, Sector 2, Guru Gian Vihar,
Jawaddi Taksal, Ludhiana, Punjab 141002